Weapons of Mass Destruction Found (An
Address to the Dead, cont'd...)
by
Michael
Tsarion
◊ ◊ ◊
The
Constitution Con
The
first function of the founders of nations, after
the founding itself, is to devise a set of true
falsehoods about origins - a mythology - that
will make it desirable for nationals to continue
to live under common authority, and, indeed,
make it impossible for them to entertain
contrary thoughts - Forrest McDonald (E
Pluribus Unum)
Slavery by word and parchment idolatry.
The US Constitution was created on
September 17, 1787, and ratified
behind closed doors on June 21, 1788.
Thirty nine of the fifty five
delegates attending the Philadelphia
Convention
signed the document. Their
con job is evident from the very first
line penned. Legally, the "People"
allegedly mentioned
are not sovereign but
willing slaves granted
the illusion of freedom.
From an occult point of view the
Constitution was ratified on an Atonist
festival day. It is, therefore, a patently Solar
Cult document. This is because the date
of ratification - June 21st - is the day the sun
ascends to its highest point in the zodiac.
Benjamin Franklin, James Madison and
Alexander Hamilton were three of the
men who framed the infernal Constitution and pushed for its
ratification.
Their document served the American
aristocracy, not the people. In fact the
document was never put before the people for
ratification, and was openly
opposed by the majority of men and women in
the original thirteen states.
The Constitutionalists were guileful
traitors whose attendance at the
Philadelphia Convention was kept secret
for an entire generation. Their document
served to leave the "door" of America
unlocked and ajar, so the country's
foreign enemies could surreptitiously
re-enter in the days and years following
the supposed War of Independence.
Benjamin Franklin
James Madison
Alexander Hamilton
The
hypocrisy and duplicity of the Federalists is
responsible for modern neo-imperialism
and advent of the so-called New World Order.
In our opinion these men were little more than British
agents, because King George himself - who declared eternal war on
America - could
not have done as much damage to America as
their actions wrought.
Such a tyrannical future where
property rights would be ignored, where
a massive standing army would lurk
unchallengeable, where Congressmen would
hold office for life, where ruinous
treaties would be commonplace, where
Presidential powers would make Nero
jealous, where gold and silver would
vanish from circulation to be replaced
by the worthless "notes" of a private
banking conglomeration, where the States
would be reduced to mere administrative
departments of the feds, and where the
grasp of taxation would actually reach
into the common laborer's paycheck - all
this was too fantastic to be even
theoretically contemplated during the
ratification debates - Kenneth W.
Royce (Hologram of Liberty)
When the
duplicitous Hamilton was asked
why he helped draft the
Constitution, he guardedly replied:
My motives must remain in the depository
of my own breast.
He
was but one member of the
Philadelphia Convention who secretly
resented the independence of America. One
perceptive dissenter realized this and
wrote:
The Continental convention...was
composed of some men of excellent
characters; of others who were more
remarkable for their ambition and
cunning, than their patriotism; and of
some who have been opponents to the
independence of the United States -
(Dissenting Address of the Pennsylvanian
Convention, 18 December 1787)
James Madison is considered the "father" of
the US Constitution. He was heavily
influenced, as were many American
politicians, by the philosophy of French
aristocrat Baron de Montesquieu who
believed monarchy. Madison was also
influenced by the writings of British
empiricist philosopher John Locke,
himself
"a major investor in the English slave trade
through the Royal Africa Company." Madison was
vehemently opposed to state independence and
pushed the Constitution to keep power out of the hands of ordinary
Americans. He openly advocated an
anti-Republican ideology and commented on how illiterate masses should be divided and
controlled:
Where a majority are united by a
common sentiment, and have an
opportunity, the rights of the minor
party become insecure. In a republican
government the majority, if united, have
always an opportunity. The only remedy
is to enlarge the sphere and thereby divide the
community into so great a number of
interests and parties that, in the first
place, a majority will not be likely, at
the same moment, to have a common
interest separate from that of the
whole, or of the minority; and, in the
second place, that, in case they should
have such an interest, they may not be
so apt to unite in the pursuit of it
- (Elliot's Debates, Vol. 5)
Madison was the only delegate to keep
records of proceedings at the Convention.
However, his notes were not made public
until four years after his death.
Prior to their public release the
notes had
been thoroughly edited.
The
con is evident from the Constitution's
Preamble, as we said. In fact the "People"
referred to are not citizens of
America, No! They are the
elites who rule from withina legally separate precinct known
as the District of Columbia. This district
is under federal control and the government
operating from within it is, legally
speaking, a foreign institution. The
term "We
the People" denotes this separate
ruling elite. It refers to the imperious
overlords who have granted the
Constitution to the masses within the
"United States of America;" the
non-sovereign nation under
their control. Therefore, the entity
mentioned in the first line of the Preamble
is not
the same entity mentioned in the last
line. Let's read it and uncover the cunning
artifice of its authors:
We the People of the United States, in
Order to form a more perfect Union,
establish Justice, ensure domestic
Tranquility, provide for the common
defense, promote the general Welfare,
and secure the Blessings of Liberty to
ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain
and establish this Constitution for the
United States of America.
This
is what the Preamble subtextually infers:
WE THE RULING ARISTOCRACY, in Order to
form a more perfect Union, establish
Justice, ensure domestic Tranquility,
provide for the common defense, promote
the general Welfare, and secure the
Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and
our Posterity, do ordain and establish
this Constitution FOR THE SLAVES WITHOUT RIGHTS, UNDER OUR
FEDERAL CONTROL.
Because "People" is capitalized it is a
proper noun referring to a specific body
of people-
Kenneth W. Royce (Hologram of
Liberty)
These facts explain why the word
"for" is found in the last line, not the word "of." Legally,
there is a big difference
between:
...do ordain and establish this
Constitution for the United
States of America.
and:
...do ordain and establish this
Constitution of the United States
of America.
The first rendering implies the Constitution has been
granted to one body by
another. Ergo the Constitution
is nothing more than a
totalitarian document, ratifying
aristocratic control over the
"United States of America" and
its inhabitants. The elites are
literally saying; "This document
and its articles are for
you." The point being that it
is not of you, meaning,
it is not yours by natural
right. The word "for" indicates
that the matter of the
document is bestowed
by another. And of course when a
person gives someone something,
they presumably want something
in return. This was certainly
the case for the Federalists who
conceived the Constitution.
Suggestively, the
word "of" does appear
in a
meaningful legal declaration. It
appears in the text of the Presidential Oath:
I solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will
faithfully execute the Office of
President of the United States, and will
to the best of my Ability, preserve,
protect and defend the Constitution of
the United States.
In this instance, the word "of"
designates the President as a
member of the aristocratic
elite. He is, therefore, a ruler
separate from the
citizens in the states, and of
the nation. The "for" does not
apply to the President because,
unlike the masses, he is not an
outsider. He is part of the
inner sovereign circle
referenced by the word "of." The
Constitution is "of" the ruling
elite, but is "for" the masses.
In effect, the Constitution is a
schizophrenic document. There are two
Constitutions; one for servant
masses, and one for oligarchs ruling from within the
District of Columbia. This is
why the Preamble contains two
different terms: the "United
States" (denoting the oligarchy
and their authority), and
"United States of America"
(denoting the non-sovereign
masses on the receiving end).
If the Presidential Oath read as follows,
there would be less cause for
concern:
I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I
will faithfully execute the Office of
President of the United States of
America, and will to the best of my
Ability, preserve, protect and defend
the Constitution of the United States of
America.
Then again, pigs might fly.
Alarmingly, before it was
dropped, the President's
original title was "His
Excellency."
Many critics and
authors have pointed out these disturbing
facts and rightly insist that the
so-called "United
States" is not the same thing as the
so-called
"United States of America."
Nevertheless, due to deliberate
misinformation and conditioning,
most people do believe the
terms refer to one and the same
entity. They are certainly not
inclined to think of the "United
States" (the U.S.) as a foreign
corporation. Furthermore,
the drafters of the Constitution intentionally saw to
it the term "United States"
had more than one meaning.
Specifically, they
knew the term did not refer to citizens of a state.
Once-upon-a-time an American could have
been a citizen of a state without being a citizen
of the nation. This political
idiosyncrasy did not
suit the Federalists who ingeniously manipulated the
words and terms we are
familiar with. It is a
old trick that serves the
cause of
totalitarians no end.
...not only were the poly meanings of
"United States" intentionally and
expressly used within the Constitution,
but often in ways as to actually invite
confusion. For such brilliant men to
explain three jurisdictional concepts
would, on its face, pose a great mystery-
Kenneth W. Royce (Hologram of
Liberty)
When members of the police or military
swear to serve, uphold and protect the
Constitution and "United States,"
they probably imagine their oath is
sworn to the American people. Nothing
could be further from the truth. They
are, in fact, swearing to give their
labor, and possibly their lives,
for the diabolical corporate executives
of Washington D.C.
Oaths of allegiance are
fine, as long as you know
who or what your swearing
them
to.
In short, the U.S. and the
U.S.A., are not the same entity.
The alleged "People" are not, therefore,
free and sovereign members of a
country, as they would have been
under the Articles of
Confederation drawn up
after the War of
Independence. No, they were and
still are merely employees of a
privately run corporation. They
do not have rights, they have
provisionally granted privileges. They have liberty,
but do not have permanent and
inviolable sovereignty or freedom.
The Constitution, as currently
interpreted, now resembles what the
Founding Lawyers truly desired in their
aristocratic heart of hearts. Two
centuries of history have lifted the
veil from that picture of Dorian Gray,
leaving us with the Hag of Hegemony -
Kenneth W. Royce (Hologram of
Liberty)
The State...both in its genesis and by
its primary intention, is purely
anti-social. It is not based on the idea
of natural rights, but on the idea that
the individual has no rights except
those that the State may provisionally
grant him -
Albert Jay Nock(Our Enemy,
the State)
Hologram of
Liberty,
by K. W. Royce. Probably the best
book dealing with the con of the
Constitution.
The
duplicity served to
strengthen Federal power. Because of the
Constitution, the populace have been
intentionally stripped of their sovereign
rights. It is also because of this particular
chicanery that Americans presently find
themselves politically and economically
compromised. The Federalist plan was nothing
less than an act of
war. It was the plan of agent provocateurs
and fifth columnists. Only a very few
authors have stated this in so many words.
However, we are convinced that the early Federalists
were ministers of the Crown. They
accomplished with their pens what armed
legions failed to do by open war. We
believe that after the Constitution was
ratified, Americans became, in effect,
subjects of the aristocracy. The king who
hated America, did not resend his army to
attack with force of arms. He knew the
country could be conquered and brought under
British control by other means:
The phrase "direct and immediate
allegiance" is something right out of
feudal law...Americans who became "U.S.
citizens" have transposed themselves
from one system into another
fundamentally different from the
first...Americans have unknowingly
joined a modern feudal system in which
they must render a percentage of their
toil to their federal master
-
Kenneth W. Royce (Hologram of
Liberty)
The non-federal state Citizenship
became virtually unknown as millions of
state Americans were tricked out of
their sovereignty and into federal
citizenship - and thus into federal
jurisdiction. Today, the states have
been all but replaced by corporate,
federal overlays...There's probably not
enough left of the original states for
Americans to resume state Citizenship
- ibid
These
facts show that the
Constitution was not a progressive document.
On the contrary, its cunning drafters
concocted it knowing that it would help to usher in the
kind of Merchant State system that
flourished earlier in America, before the
War of Independence, and shortly after the
first settlers arrived, with their
British system of law. As Albert Jay Nock explains:
The fundamental fact to be observed
in any survey of the American State's
initial development is the one whose
importance was first remarked, I
believe, by Mr. Beard; that the
trading-company - the commercial
corporation for colonization - was
actually an autonomous State. "Like the
State," says Mr. Beard, "it had a
constitution, a charter issued by the
Crown...it had a territorial basis, a
grant of land often greater in area than
a score of European
principalities...every essential element
long afterward found in the government
of the American State appeared in the
chartered corporation that started
English civilization in America" - (Our
Enemy, the State)
Nock
goes on to emphasize the connections between
the "Old World" system of control, and the
so-called "New World" system:
...the system of civil order established
in America was the State-system of the
"mother countries"...the only thing that
distinguished it was that the exploited
and dependant class was situated at an
unusual distance from the owning and
exploiting class. The headquarters of
the autonomous State were on one side of
the Atlantic, and its subjects on the
other.
The
elites of Britain and Europe knew that
remote control was only feasible for a short
time. They knew they had to have their
agents on site in order for the engines of
exploitation to work efficiently.
Consequently, in 1628, during the reign of
Charles I, the oligarchs established the
Massachusetts Bay Company in America. Many
of the Constitution's most illustrious
signers became wealthy from their memberships
of
corporations such as the Massachusetts Bay
Company which overflowed
with agents of the British Crown. Business
the American way is, it seems, business the
British way.
While it is not
surprising that America's Founding
Fathers were mostly slave owners, a
legal activity, it may be surprising to
discover that they were often smugglers
as well. Profits from drug running,
smuggling, slave trading, and even
piracy are directly responsible for the
founding of several of the country's
most important banks, which are still in
operation today. New England's staunch
insurance business was born and
prospered through profits earned from
insuring opium and slave ships. The
large railroad system that was built
throughout the continental United States
in the nineteenth century was funded
with profits from illegal drug
smuggling. And one of the greatest opium
fortunes would provide seed money for
the telephone and communications
industry - Steven Sora (Secret
Societies of America's Elite)
Flag of the British East India
Company
Flag of the "United States"
Corporation. Red, White and Blue
are known as the Colors of the
King.
Of
course there were clever men who knew what
was going on. Even before the Constitution -
the document of servitude - was signed and
ratified, the warnings went out:
That investigation into the nature
and construction of the new
constitution, which the conspirators
have so long and zealously struggled
against, has, notwithstanding their
partial success, so far taken place as
to ascertain the enormity of their
criminality. That system which was
pompously displayed as the perfection of
government, proves upon examination to
be the most odious system of tyranny
that was ever projected, a many headed
hydra of despotism, whose complicated
and various evils would be infinitely
more oppressive and afflictive than the
scourge of any tyrant - "Centinel"
(Essay 12, 23 January 1788)
The Articles of Confederation
and Perpetual Union, was
America's true Constitution
before it was cunningly derided
and overruled by self-serving traitors
known, in today's parlance, as
Globalists or Internationalists.
The
anonymous author of this diatribe would not
be in the least bit surprised to see the
present state of decay, and neither would
Thomas Paine, Patrick Henry, Thomas
Jefferson, or Andrew Jackson. They would
simply know that their worst fears were
justified.
As we said, the
rise of imperialism in America is the result of the
"door" of America being
deliberately left ajar, so to speak. The enemies of
America were able to creep in whenever they
chose. And
creep in they did, confident the country
would eventually fall into their hands. They
knew their agents were ensconced within
the country and that they could misuse their
positions of authority within government and
big business to gradually
undermine the Articles of
Confederation that guaranteed each and
every American the rights they deserved. They knew they
simply had to continue employing the "divide
and rule" tactic to further Globalist interests.
During his
reign lunatic King George III adamantly proclaimed his
utter hatred for the American
rebels. He openly declared
"eternal" war on America, and
his word was law to his
industrious lieutenants. True to
form, agents of the British
Crown have been waging eternal
war on the country ever since
their despicable master's day.
The men who undermined the
Articles of the Confederation
and hustled the
Constitution had statues
and portraits raised in their
honor. Volumes have been written
about their deeds, but rarely
has the truth been told. Throughout America and
the world the traitors are
lauded as
great revolutionaries, thinkers
and humanitarians. Their
ideological descendants openly and unashamedly work
hand in hand with British and
European oligarchs, using fear and panic to further
their agendas. They continue to erode whatever is left of the
privileges once bestowed upon their
slaves.
We have "federal
sheriffs" beyond
imagination. There are forty
six civilian agencies of the
Federal Government whose
agents carry guns and have
the power to make arrests.
These "great insults on the
people" have been allowed
because there is little we
can do about them, short of
armed rebellion. And by the
way, no laws authorizing
"civil forfeiture" or other
related measures of tyranny
have been struck down by the
federal courts - Kenneth
W. Royce (Hologram of
Liberty)
We have plenty of rights in this
country, provided you don't get caught
exercising them - Terry Mitchell
(Editor of The Revolutionary Toker)
Patrick Henry was one patriot who understood
what was going on. He did not attend the
Convention in Philadelphia, and said: "I
smell a rat." He was dead right. But there
was more than one stinking human rat loose
at the Convention. The traitors referred to
themselves as "Federalists" because they knew
the people would think of them as
servants of America. And they were right.
Their smokescreen worked wonderfully. Today
the misuse of words and terms continues.
George Bush's "Patriot Acts" dupe the uninformed masses and give them the
impression it is patriotic to give up
hard won rights in turn for
government protection.
For
centuries, pillage by invading armies was a
normal part of warfare…Nowadays, at least in
more civilized countries, we do not let armies
rampage for booty. We leave the pillaging to men
in suits, and we don’t call it pillaging
anymore. We call it economic development -
Brian Whitaker (The Guardian)
The
Bushes
did as their predecessors had done two hundred
years ago. The Federalist traitors hurried
the ratification process along and gave the
Convention delegates and American people
little time to scrutinize the Constitution's articles.
George W. Bush
did likewise when it came to his scurrilous
Patriot Acts. Moreover, he personally saw to
it that the investigations into the causes of
the September Eleventh tragedy were hampered
and limited:
President Bush personally asked
Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle…to
limit the Congressional investigation
into the events of September 11,
Congressional and White House sources
told CNN…The request was made at a
private meeting with Congressional
leaders - Gore Vidal (Dreaming
War)
George W. Bush's lack of regard for the
Constitution is not unique. He is a
Globalist who does not serve America. He is
one of many men who have used the
Constitution as a stepping stone toward what
might be described as an
United World Super State. Nowadays the conspirators
who labored toward this utopian
chimera appear to be less inclined to conceal the reasons for
their intrigue. As George W. Bush put it:
It is the sacred principles enshrined
in the United Nations Charter to which
the American people will henceforth
pledge their allegiance - (Address
to the UN General Assembly, February 1
1992)
The world can therefore seize the
opportunity (the Persian Gulf crisis) to
fulfill the long held promise of a New
World Order where diverse nations are
drawn together in common cause to
achieve the universal aspirations of
mankind - (State of the Union
Address, January 29 1991)
Author Forrest MacDonald clarified the issue
concerning the undermining of the Articles
of Confederation. In his book entitled
Alexander Hamilton: A Biography,
he wrote:
What did determine the outcome were the
rules of the contest, which Hamilton
played an important part in formulating.
The convention decided to disregard the
amendment procedures prescribed in the
Articles of Confederation and instead
provided that each state should hold a
special election for delegates to a
ratifying convention...Had the rules of
the Articles of Confederation been
adhered to, the Constitution would never
have been adopted.
The
dissenters knew what lay in store and were worried. Their warnings went
largely unheard and the ratification of the
Constitution hurriedly commenced regardless
of the warnings of perceptive
critics:
It is insisted, indeed, that this
constitution must be received, be it
ever so imperfect. But remember, when
the people once part with power, they
can seldom or never resume it again by
by force. Many instances can be produced
in which the people have voluntarily
increased the powers of their rulers;
but few, if any, in which rulers have
willingly abridged their authority -
"Brutus" (Essay 1, 18 October
1787)
Consider what you are about to do
before your part with this Government.
Take longer time in reckoning things:
Revolutions like this have happened in
almost every country in Europe: Similar
examples are...ancient Greece and
ancient Rome: Instances of the people
losing their liberty by their own
carelessness and the ambition of a few
- Patrick Henry (Speech of 5 June
1778)
Does it not insult your judgment to
tell you, Adopt first, and then
amend?...Is your rage for novelty so
great, that you are first to sign and
seal, and then retract?...agree to bind
yourself hand and foot - for the sake of
what? of being unbound?...to go into a
dungeon - for what? To get out? Is there
no danger, when you go in, that the
bolts of federal authority shall shut
you in? - Patrick Henry (Speech to
the Virginia ratifying assembly 1788)
I look upon the Constitution as the
most fatal plan that could be possibly
be conceived to enslave a free people
- ibid
No
sooner was the Constitution ratified than
the oligarchs began acting tyrannically
toward the American people.
British
agent President George Washington - who
presided over the signing of the
Constitution and who was a member of the
Ohio Company of Virginia, the Mississippi
Company, and the Potomac Company - sent
thirteen thousand armed troops to violently
stamp out the so-called Whiskey Rebellion of
1794. This rebellion was against heavy
taxation.
The victims of
government oppression soon discovered they could
not use the Constitution to receive justice.
It contained little provision for the
underclasses.
It gave complete suzerainty to the courts and
judges, not to the people or states. To
all intents and purposes it was as if the
War of Independence had never been fought.
The
Constitution merely made it possible for
agents of the British Crown to operate
as if they served the citizens of
America. In this regard, nothing has
changed.
The facts about the American Revolution
show that in the early days, in the mid
1770's, the colonialists suffered a
series of defeats. Strategic secrets
were being passed to the British. The
facts also show that an American army
general, Benedict Arnold, was a traitor
who plotted to surrender the fort at
West Point to the British and turn the
tide of war against his own side. The
facts link Washington with Arnold when
it comes to Freemasonry and the facts
show that the day the plot was
discovered, Washington was due to meet
Arnold at West Point...Washington has
been working with Arnold and passing
secrets to the British
- Robert Cooper (Interview on Dan
Brown's The Lost Symbol)
The tyranny continued in 1798 with the
Alien and Sedition Acts. These Acts made
criticism of
federal officials a punishable offence. The Constitution served to strengthen the powers
of the wealthy aristocratic class in
America. It possessed few benefits for
the average citizen and ultimately
legalized widespread acts of confiscation and
extortion. As Thomas Jefferson once
remarked "The natural progress of things is for
liberty to yield and government to gain
ground." The point is emphasized by
Constitutional scholar and author Kenneth W.
Royce:
If analyzed in contrast to history since
1787, it appears that the Constitution
was purposely laden with several
components designed to nearly guarantee
the gradual expansion of the Federal
Government - at the expense of the
States and the people -
(Hologram of Liberty)
The Founding Fathers may have
referred to themselves as
Federalists. But this was, as we
said, yet
one more cunning play on words.
Master propagandists such as Vladimir Lenin probably learned
tactics from America's
faux Federalists.
Patrick Henry is known for his
"Give me Liberty, or give me
Death!" speech. Along with
Samuel Adams and Thomas Paine,
he is remembered as one of the
most influential and radical
advocates of the American
Revolution and of republicanism,
especially in his denunciations
of corruption in government
officials - (Wikipedia Online
Encyclopedia)
The original
Federalists demanded a
government of limited powers
and were for State power. Their
needs were ably
met by the Articles of
Confederation ratified in 1781.
After the War of Independence
(1775 to 1783),
Americans had the Constitution
forced upon them. Ever since
then Americans have been duped
about the prestige of the
document. The people and
representatives of the original thirteen
states were not allowed enough
time to decide whether the
document was sound or not.
Patrick Henry questioned the
haste and warned of the
consequences of accepting the
Constitution
without due consideration and
debate. He knew that State
representatives needed at least
a year to mull over the articles
of the Constitution. He spoke
out and said:
Why then tell us of dangers
to terrify us into an
adoption of this new
Government? And yet who
knows the dangers that this
new system may produce; they
are out of sight of the
common people: They cannot
foresee latent consequences:
I dread the operation of it
on the middling and lower
class of people: It is for
them I fear the adoption of
this system...I see jeopardy
in this new Government. I
see none from our present
one.
As we said, the Constitution's articles scandalously allowed
the Supreme Court to possess almost
unlimited legal powers:
No country has given its courts such
extraordinary power. Not Britain, where
an act of Parliament binds the courts.
Not India...Not even West Germany or
Ireland, where the power of judicial
review is established but exercised on a
narrower scale. The President is
elected. State legislators and Governors
are elected. Supreme Court Justices are
not elected: they are appointed for life
- Archibald Cox (The Court and the
Constitution)
Despite widespread resistance and a spirit of
animosity toward the Constitution's
articles, its cheerleaders Madison,
Hamilton, Franklin and Washington
relentlessly pressed
on. They ensured that resistance to their
will was summarily suppressed.
Most troublesome to the framers of
the Constitution was the increasing
insurgent spirit evidenced among the
people. Fearing the popular takeover of
state governments, the wealthy class
looked to a national government as a
means of protecting their interests.
Even in states where they were inclined
to avoid strong federation, the rich,
once faced with the threat of popular
rule and realizing that a political
alliance with conservatives from other
states would be a safeguard if the
radicals could capture the state
government...gave up 'state rights' for
'nationalism' without hesitation -
Michael Parenti (Democracy for the
Few)
Within a month after the 17 September
signing, a torrent of anti-constitution
essays appeared in the newspapers,
pleasing for prudent wisdom. This
horrified three particular federalists,
who quickly went on the editorial
offensive in what was to be a staggering
85 essays totaling some 175,000 words.
The Federalist Papers were written by
Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and
John Jay to defend the proposed
Constitution...Hamilton, Madison, and
Jay hid for years behind the pseudonym "Publius"...to
conceal from the public their true
identities, and Convention attendance
- Kenneth W. Royce (Hologram of
Liberty)
George Washington addressing the
delegates during the signing of
the US Constitution. Benjamin
Franklin (a member of the
English Hell Fire Club) is shown in the center
of the canvas. His design for
the Seal of the United States
depicted Moses leading the
Children of Israel across the
Red Sea. Franklin's nickname
among his elite secret society
chums was "Moses." Like his many
Masonic associates in America,
England, and France, he was an Atonist
or, in conventional
parlance, a Luciferian. His backers were
powerful royal figures such as
Charles de Lorraine and the Duke
d'Orleans. The last thing on his
mind was freedom for the
American people. He was a
wealthy speculator in land, and a member of the Vandalia
Company, whose land grant
happened (coincidentally of
course) to have been awarded by
the British Crown. (Click pic for
full scene.)
The
secretiveness of the proceedings at the
Convention reinforced the suspicions of many critics of the
Constitution. Kenneth W. Royce tell us:
Little wonder why the Constitution operated
under such extraordinary secrecy. Held on
the second floor, windows shut, with
sentries posted below, the delegates were
sworn to strict silence. Not until 32 years
later (a generation, you see) were the
proceeding's Journals published. Madison's
notes (thoroughly edited) weren't published
until 53 years later, in 1840.
Royce
also comments on the measures taken by the
Federalists to conceal
the infighting that took place among delegates
at the Convention:
Great propaganda measures were employed to
conceal the Convention's true atmosphere of
acrimonious dissent.
The state of
affairs was noted by a journalist, who wrote:
So great is the unanimity, we
hear, that prevails in the Convention, upon all
great federal subjects, that it has been
proposed to call the room in which they assemble
- Unanimity Hall - (Pennsylvania
Packet and Daily Advertiser, 19 July 1787)
Fifty five delegates
attended the Philadelphia
Convention - forty one politicians and
thirty four lawyers. Not a single person from the
working class was present. Those men who attempted to
delay proceedings by boycotting the Convention were
sought out by troops and forcibly dragged to the
Convention hall.
Electing the respected General George Washington
as Convention president, with the added presence
of Benjamin Franklin, was responsible for much
of the public's "false confidences." Of the 55
delegates, 41 were politicians and 34 were
lawyers...According to delegate James McHenry,
at least 21 of the 55 delegates favored some
form of monarchy - Kenneth W. Royce (Hologram
of Liberty)
Prime mover
in the conspiracy to undermine the Articles of
Confederation was traitor Alexander Hamilton. In The Federalist Papers, Douglas Adair comments on Hamilton's dilemma:
Hamilton's disillusion with the workings of the
Confederation and his fear of democracy,
especially after Shay's Rebellion, had convinced
him that it would be almost impossible to set up
a stable republic in a country as large as the
United States. As he informed the Convention,
any society in which political power was vested
in the hands of all the people would be
continually torn by the class struggles of the
rich and poor. Hamilton's remedy for this class
war the Hobbesian expedient of setting up a
leviathan state to impose order upon the
American People from above, Hamilton was sure
that the only alternative to social anarchy was
the establishment of a consolidated government
capable of maintaining itself independently of
the people's will.
Hamilton's
tactics worked. He knew the mindset of the men he
represented. He knew all he had to do was
instill enough fear into the delegates to achieve
the desired result. Federalists and Globalists
continue to employ this ruse to further
agendas. It is little more than conflict control.
That
was the genius of the Constitution: To 1.
utterly transform political reality without the
people understanding it; 2. destroy the States
without sound or smoke and 3. foist a government
destined to become, over the distant horizon,
fully national in scope and authority. By the
time the States and the people would realize
they'd been trumped, it would be too late
- Kenneth W. Royce (Hologram of Liberty)
Hamilton,
Madison and their Federalist gang of conspirators
were ecstatic over the success of their "divide and
rule" tactics. After the damage was done Madison
bragged about the debacle he had deliberately helped
foment:
One
anti-federalist opinion tell us that the
proposed constitution ought to be rejected
because it is not a confederation of the States,
but a government over individuals. Another
admits that it ought to be a government over
individuals to a certain extent but by no means
to extent proposed. A third does not object to a
government over individuals but to the want of a
bill of rights. A fourth concurs in the absolute
necessity of a bill of rights but contends that
it ought to be declaratory, not for the personal
rights of individuals, but of the rights
reserved to the States in their political
capacity. A fifth is of the opinion that a bill
of rights of any sort would be superfluous and
misplaced and that the plan would be
unexceptional except for the fatal power of
regulating the times and place of elections.
Thomas
Jefferson (principle author of the Declaration
of Independence) was appalled at the liberties taken by
Hamilton and those he continued taking in the years following the Constitution's
ratification. He noticed Hamilton was
contemptuous of the Constitution he himself cheerled, and as ambitiously attempting to obtain broader powers
for central government. Hamilton soon proposed
changes well outside the scope of the
Constitution's precepts. Obviously, the Constitution was merely
one means to many ends for Hamilton and his
self-serving aristocratic cronies. Incensed by
Hamilton's scheming Jefferson wrote:
I
will not suffer...the slanders of Hamilton whose
history, from the moment at which history can
stoop to notice him, is a tissue of machinations
against the liberty of the country which has not
only received and given him bread, but heaped
honors on his head - (Jefferson to
Washington, 1792)
Eventually
even Hamilton's colleague James Madison began to
chafe at his obvious disdain for the people and
Constitutional provisos:
As
Madison watched Hamilton's program develop, he
became disillusioned and bitter. In the
Convention he had fought to create a
Constitution under which 'the interests and
rights of every class of citizen should be duly
represented and understood.' Now he saw the
machinery of his new government being used to
exploit the mass of the people in the interest
of a small minority -
Douglas Adair (The
Federalist Papers)
Among
Hamilton's most insidious programs was the creation
of the first private bank. He pushed for the
establishment of this scurrilously extortionist
organization. His co-conspirator, arch-traitor Robert Morris, was undoubtedly an
agent of European aristocracy.
Financial genius Robert
Morris organized the first bank. He and his
associates believed that the bank should be
modeled after the Bank of England…Secret
investors put up $400,000 to start this
bank. This attempt failed after two short
years…Secretary of the Treasury Alexander
Hamilton, submitted a proposal to Congress
in 1790 for a central bank. Interestingly
enough, Hamilton had been an aide of Robert
Morris in the initial experience of central
banking in North America
- Bill Hughes (The Secret
Terrorists)
Financier Nicholas Biddle, was president
of the Second National Bank of the
United States, established in 1817. He was a servant of the Jesuits,
and may have been in contact with the
Rothschilds or their predecessors,
the Hahns.
Jewish financier Haym Solomon. A
precursor to the Rothschilds, he was a
close colleague of Robert Morris.
The
intrigue of affluent Jewish financier
families has been tracked and delineated
by several authors.
The insidious pirate, slave-trader, and
arch-traitorRobert Morris, was the buddy of
Alexander Hamilton and Haym Solomon. In 1791 he was appointed U.S.
Superintendent of Finance.
Arch-traitor Aaron Burr. Relatively unknown to most
Americans, Burr was a prime mover within the cabal
that worked to undermine American sovereignty. This
truly insidious character's plotting is revealed in
Anton Chaitkin's masterly work entitled
Treason
in America.
Norman Dodd,
Research Director of the 1950s Reese
Commission - whch investigated America's tax-exempt
foundations) - finally uncovered the dirt on Morris:
Robert Morris (signer of the
Declaration of Independence) was the personality
in this country who used his fortune to finance
the Continental army and at the end of the
revolution, Mr. Morris found himself diluted of
his fortune. So after the revolution was over he
then turned his attention to, as an individual,
of rebuilding a fortune and his area of activity
was in land speculation. At that time he was
contacted by an agent of wealth lodged abroad
and this wealth was represented by an entity
which is historically referred to as the “House
of Orange.” However, we did know the agent of
the House of Orange who contacted Robert Morris
after he began to rebuild his fortune, and that
personality was a man by the name of Haym
Saloman, and he was an agent of the House of
Orange in this country, and it was through him
that Mr. Morris was offered considerable
financial accommodation, which would enable him
to, working capital, you might say, to rebuild
his fortune.
Haym Soloman was, of course, a
servant of the Jewish Kahal and Jesuit
Order. Like the Rothschilds who rose to power
shortly after his time,
Solomon
was a lackey of European royalty - the Hanoverians,
Hapsburgs, Stuarts and related houses. King
George III (America's arch-enemy) was a senior
member of the Dutch House of Orange or Hanover.
The royals maintain control over their
disposable lieutenants by way of Masonic
societies such as the Skull and Bones,
and Bohemian Club. The double-headed eagle
(emblem of Scottish Rite Masonry) is
identical to the royal arms of
European dynasties such as the
Hapsburgs.
These royal dynasties own
corporations and businesses all over the world and
have the power and skill to purchase and use men as easily as they do companies.
Of course they do not openly display their
colors. They are
discreet and prefer to exercise control by way
of devious but
disposable agents, faceless companies and shadowy
banking houses. One of the most important
aristocratically controlled engines is the
Société
Générale de Belgique (Society
General of Belgium). From
1840 to 1870 (before the Rothschilds
were handed the wheel), this financial consortium was directly
controlled by Belgium's King Leopold II, grandson of
Queen Victoria and member of the powerful
Saxe-Coburg-Gotha dynasty.
The Society was
founded in 1822, by none other than King
William I of the House of Orange. America's number
one enemy, King George III, was of the same royal
line as William I. Their ancestor, Duchess Sophia of
Hanover was heir to the English throne.
Her son became George I of Great Britain. His
grandson was infamous King George III. These
monarchs were members of the so-called "Black
Nobility" of Venice and Holland. By way of their
financial consortiums they and their relatives maintained control remotely over colonies that
included America.
The corporate name that is
assigned to that entity, as the 18th turned into
the 19th century, is called Societie Genearale
de Belgique, which is the largest accumulation
of privately controlled tangible wealth in the
world - Andrew Power (Ireland:
Land of the Pharaohs)
William of Orange it was...who established the original SGDB
which was to finance the growth of a great part
of Belgian industry and which today remains by
far the most important single force in the
country’s economic life. La Generale list the
Belgian royal family as well as the Vatican
among its shareholders in addition to that
all-powerful family alliance behind Belgian
finances – the Solvays, the Boels and the
Janssens…In 1838 the rival Banque de Belgique
succumbed to the general crisis in Europe and
closed its doors but the SGDB, supported by the
Rothschilds, remained open, paying out coin
against the notes issued by its competitor
- ibid
Prince Bernhard is known to be an
influential member of the SGDB, a mysterious
organization that seems to be an association of
large corporate interests from many countries.
American firms associated with this society are
said to be among the large corporations whose
officers are members of the Council on Foreign
Relations and related organizations
– Dan Smoot (The
Invisible Government)
Because of the
intervention of men such as Thomas Jefferson and
Andrew Jackson, the
Federalist program to socially and economicallyundermine Americatemporarily
failed. But time was on the side of the
conspiring Nationalists. The second Federal Bank was established six years later, in 1816. President
Monroe appointed Jesuit agent Nicholas Biddle as
its first president.
Nicholas Biddle, another one
of their agents, carried out phase two of the
Jesuit attack. Biddle was a brilliant financier,
having graduated from the University of
Pennsylvania at the age of thirteen. He was a
master of the science of money. By the time that
Jackson had come to the Presidency in 1828,
Biddle was in full control of the Federal
government’s central bank. This was not the
first time that a central bank had been
established. Twice before, first under Robert
Morris, and then under Alexander Hamilton, had a
central bank been tried, but in both cases it
had failed because of fraudulent actions on the
part of the bankers who were in control. After
the war of 1812, a central bank was tried again,
and it was in this third attempt that we find
Mr. Biddle - Bill
Hughes (The Secret Terrorists)
The
scandalous intrigue of affluent, influential
Jewish financier families, such as Rothschild,
Oppenheimer, Lazard, Warburg, Schiff, Kuhn,
Loeb, Goldman, Sachs, and so on, has been
tracked and delineated by several authors.
Under the surface, the
Rothschilds long had a powerful influence in
dictating American financial laws. The law
records show that they were powers in the
old Bank of the United States –
Gustavus Meyers (History
of the Great American Fortunes)
Wilhelm IX, Elector of Hesse-Kassel. He
employed Mayer Amschel Rothschild. We
must inquire why such a royal would
employ and promote a Jewish
ghetto-dweller.
The evidence clearly shows these
families were no friends of America. The Rothschilds in particular received prestigious awards
from America's deadliest enemies. For services
rendered leading members of the Rothschild family have been
endowed with elite status by royals
and popes. Amschel Mayer Rothschild, for example, was a
Knight of Malta.
The
Holy Roman Emperors
from the House of Habsburg
kept a considerable number of court Jews. Among
those of Emperor Ferdinand
II are mentioned the following:
Solomon and
Ber Mayer...Joseph
Pincherle of Görz;
Moses and Joseph Marburger
(Morpurgo) of
Gradisca;
Ventura Pariente of
Trieste; the
physician Elijah Chalfon
of Vienna;
Samuel zum Drachen,
Samuel zum Straussen,
and Samuel zum Weissen
Drachen of
Frankfort-on-the-Main; and
Mordecai Meisel, of
Prague. A
specially favored court Jew was
Jacob Bassevi, the
first Jew to be ennobled, with the title "von
Treuenberg" - (Wikipedia Online
Encyclopedia. Entry on Court Jews)
Undoubtedly the Rothschild
brothers financially
backed the Federalists in a similar manner as they
backed the Duke of Wellington, Cecil Rhodes, Vladimir Lenin, Leon Trotsky,
Adolf Hitler, and many other fascists and
megalomaniacs. But they were not the
first to do so. Agents of the
Jesuit Order and Jewish Kahal, such as Haym Solomon,
had clearly been active in Federalist circles
before the Rothschild dynasty were given the
reins of financial control. In any case, the Rothschilds and their agents
-
the Schiffs, Bauers, Oppenheimers and Warburgs - were unquestionably instrumental in formulating the so-called Jekyll
Island Agreement which was the basis for the
creation of the private Federal Reserve Bank. The
Federal Reserve Act was passed on December 22, 1913.
Interestingly, this is the time of the Winter
Solstice, an important day on the
Luciferian calendar.
In 1781, Congress established the
Office of Finance to save the United States from
fiscal ruin. Salomon allied himself with
Superintendent of Finance William Morris and
became one of the most effective brokers of
bills of exchange to meet federal government
expenses. Salomon also personally advanced funds
to members of the Continental Congress and other
federal officers, charging interest and
commissions well below the market rates -
Michael
Feldberg (Haym
Salomon: The Rest of the Story)
James
Madison confessed that "I have for some time...been a pensioner on the favor of Haym Salomon, a
Jew broker" - ibid
Solomon supposedly wrote the
first draft of the United States Constitution
according to some historians. Some claim that he
designed the Great Seal of the United States,
which is why it has what some believe resembles
a Jewish Star above the eagle's head design, and
it is also on the back of every American one
dollar bill. He believed the United States would
become a world power - (Hyam Solomon Bio,
Indopedia.org)
The blunt reality is that the
Rothschild banking dynasty in Europe was the
dominant force, both financially and
politically, in the formation of the Bank of the
United States - G.
Edward Griffin (The
Creature from Jekyll Island)
The Rothschilds were Jesuits
who used their Jewish background as a façade to
cover their sinister activities. The Jesuits,
working through Rothschild and Biddle, sought to
gain control of the banking system of the United
States – Bill Hughes (The Secret
Terrorists)
Over the years since N. M.
Rothschild...had been, for a time, the official
European banker for the U.S., government and was
a pledged supporter of the Bank of the United
States - Derek Wilson
(Rothschild: The Wealth and Power of a
Dynasty)
He was lord and master of the
money-market of the world, and of course
virtually lord and master of everything else…He
literally held the revenues of Southern Italy in
pawn, and monarchs and ministers of all
countries courted his advice and were guided by
his suggestions –
Benjamin Disraeli (Prime Minister
of England writing on Lord Rothschild)
Aware that the Rothschilds are an
important Jewish family, I looked them up in
Encyclopedia Judaica and discovered that they
bear the title “Guardians of the Vatican
Treasury”…The appointment of Rothschild gave the
black papacy absolute financial power and
secrecy. Who would ever search a family of
orthodox Jews for the key to the wealth of the
Roman Catholic Church? -
F. Tupper Saussy (Rulers of
Evil)
The Hofjuden (Court Jews)
Amschel Mayer Rothschild fathered five sons who jointly formed one
of the most powerful banking families in
history. Amschel died in 1812, which
means he may have actively conspired with the
Federalists who attempted to found the
first US federal bank in 1791. By 1789,
Amschel was assisting the House of Hesse and
British Crown with their attempts to
undermine Napoleon.
Mayer Amschel Rothschild, took over the
reigns from his father. He was a Knight
of Malta. Elite Masonic Jews had long
worked as money men and advisors to the
Turks, Huns, and Church of Rome. Mayer died in
1855, which means he was in a position
to involve himself in the conspiracy to
open the second US Federal bank.
Nathan Mayer Rothschild was in charge of the London
branch of his family's banking cartel. He was
already working in the Stock Exchange from 1804. He
established his London bank in 1811. He died in
1836. Of course, long before Nathan's time, Jewish
financiers had been active in England. For example,
during the Civil War (1642–1651), Manasseh Ben
Israel, funded the tyrant Oliver Cromwell.
James Mayer Rothschild was advisor to two French
kings. Highly decorated, he and his four
brothers were bestowed the hereditary title of
Baron by Austria's Francis II (the Holy Roman
Emperor). James was also appointed
consul-general of the Austrian Empire and, in 1823,
he was awarded the French Legion of Honor. The
predecessors of the Rothschilds were the Hahn
family. The Rothschilds are related to the Bauers,
Oppenheimers, Warburgs and Schiffs. These Khazarian families
were able lieutenants of royalty, not the
architects of control, as many misinformed authors
believe. They exercise enormous influence over
the American government by
way of Masonic lodges and Federal orgs such
as the Federal Reserve Banks.
The facts
show that traitorous Nationalists (or
should we say Internationalists),
such as Hamilton, Morris, Solomon, Burr and Biddle
did not have the best interests of ordinary
Americans at heart. On the contrary, by way of their
Constitution, and later by way of their banks and
credit houses, they sought to subjugate and
impoverish the citizens of America. In his excellent
books The Secret Terrorists and
Enemy Unmasked, Bill Hughes details the
strong arm methods used by Biddle to force wary
President Andrew Jackson into commissioning the
founding of the Federal Bank:
Biddle
responded to Jackson refusing to allow him to
re-establish the central bank by shrinking the
nation’s money supply. He did this by refusing
to make loans. By so doing, he upended the
economy and money disappeared. Unemployment ran
high. Companies went bankrupt because they
could not pay their loans…So confident was he
that he publicly boasted that he had caused the
economic wars in America.
Is
there no danger to our liberty and independence
in a bank that in its nature has so little to
bind it to our country? Is there not cause to
tremble for the purity of our elections in peace
and for the independence of our country in war?
Controlling our currency, receiving our public
monies, and holding themselves in dependence, it
would be more formidable and dangerous than a
naval and military power of the enemy –
President Andrew Jackson
Because
Andrew Jackson persistently resisted the threats and
devices of the bankers, he was the victim of an
attempted assassination. The gunman was a certain
Richard Lawrence. G. Edward Griffin wrote:
…Lawrence...boasted to friends
that he had been in touch with powerful people
in Europe who had promised to protect him from
punishment should he be caught
– (The Creature from Jekyll Island)
The Federal
bankers caused the Depression of 1929, and saw to it
that thousands of American businesses were ruined.
They funded Adolf Hitler, and financed Lenin's
murderous Bolsheviks. Avaricious financial
organizations that plague the planet, such as the
World Bank and IMF (International Monetary Fund),
are merely tentacles of the Federal System.
Immense sums belonging to our
national depositors have been given to Germany
on no collateral security whatsoever…Billions
upon billions of our money has been pumped into
Germany by the Federal Reserve Board and the
Federal Reserve Banks -
H. S. Kenan (The Federal
Reserve Bank)
Sir Joseph
Stamp was director of the Bank of England from
1928 to 1941. He openly addressed the colossal power
of the Bankers:
The
modern banking system manufactures money out of
nothing. The process is perhaps the most
astounding piece of sleight of hand that was
ever invented.
Banking
was conceived in iniquity and born in sin.
Bankers
own the Earth. Take it away from them, but leave
them the power to create money, and with the
flick of a pen they will create enough money to
buy it back again...Take
this great power away from them and all great
fortunes like mine will disappear, and they
ought to disappear, for then this would be a
better and happier world to live in.
But if
you want to continue to be slaves of the banks
and pay the cost of your own slavery, then let
the bankers continue to create money and control
credit.
President
Thomas Jefferson was not a Freemason, and not
the least bit interested in amassing personal wealth.
He had no love for the Federal bank and made his
position clear:
I believe that banking institutions are the most
dangerous to our liberties than standing armies.
Already they have raised up a moneyed
aristocracy that has set the government at
defiance. The issuing power should be taken from
the banks and restored to the people
to whom it properly belongs.
A private central bank issuing
the public currency is a greater menace to the
liberties of the people than a standing
army...We must not let our rulers load us with
perpetual debt.
I believe that banking
institutions are more dangerous to our liberties
than standing armies. If the American people
ever allow private banks to control the issue of
their currency, first by inflation, then by
deflation, the banks and corporations that will
grow up around the banks will deprive the people
of all property until their children wake-up
homeless on the continent their fathers
conquered.
Nevertheless Jefferson's
reputation is marred on several accounts,
not least by his appointment of British agent Albert
Gallatin as Secretary of the Treasury in 1801.
In the same year Gallatin was also appointed Vice
President. Regrettably, a statue of the duplicitous Geneva-born
Gallatin stands to this day outside the United
States Treasury building in Washington DC.
It is
interesting and suggestive to note that Alexander Hamilton's banking system precisely
paralleled that used by British bankers. He favored what
is known as the tontine capitalist system:
His
tontine scheme, fashioned after the British
tontine of 1789, involved a system of rights of
annual payments to survivors, the annuities
therefrom becoming the means of creating a
permanent investment class - Frank Bourgin
(The Great Challenge: The Myth of
Laissez-Faire in the Early Republic)
Political
figures of intelligence and cunning knew the real
reason for the War of Independence. They knew it had
to do with money and usury, and with nationwide
colonization, confiscation, and extortion. They knew
the conflict was fomented by British and European
banks, eager to establish control over America, as
they had throughout the world. This fact is admitted
by British agent Benjamin Franklin whose comment
takes us to the heart of the matter:
The
inability of the Colonists to get power to issue
their own money permanently out of the hands of
King George III and the international bankers,
was the prime reason for the revolutionary war
The
Colonists were not able to free themselves from the
clutches of the international bankers and royal
overlords. The War of Independence was not a victory
for the citizens of America. On the contrary, it was
yet one more victory for the aristocracy that has
controlled America from the beginning.
As with the real first bank, the government
had been the only depositor to put up any real
money, with the remainder being raised from
loans the investors made to each other, using
the magic of fractional reserve banking. When
time came for renewal of the charter, the
bankers were warning of bad times ahead if they
didn't get what they wanted. The charter was not
renewed. Five month later Britain had attacked
America and started the war of 1812 - (Money
as History)
Few
people are aware today that the history of the
United States, since the Revolution in 1776, has
been, in large part, the story of an epic
struggle to get free, and stay free, of control
by the European international banks. This
struggle was finally lost in 1913, when
President Woodrow Wilson signed the into effect
the Federal Reserve Act, putting the
International Banking Cartel in charge of
creating America's money -
Paul
Grignon (Money as Debt)
Thomas
Jefferson mentioned the nefarious power of the
bankers directly, saying desperately:
I wish it were possible to obtain a single
amendment to our Constitution - taking from the
federal government their power of borrowing.
Thomas Jefferson. Along with William
Paterson, Thomas Paine, Patrick Henry
and Samuel Adams, he put state's rights
before the demands of insatiable,
tyrannous Federalists.
After
Alexander Hamilton's gang had established the Federal Bank, and
the Judiciary with its unlimited power,
Jefferson's illusions concerning America's fate were
gone. In 1821, five years
before he died, he recorded his misgivings and
foreboding:
It has
long...been my opinion...that the germ of
dissolution of our federal judiciary is in the
constitution of the federal judiciary; an
irresponsible body working like gravity by night
and by day, gaining a little today and a little
tomorrow, and advancing its noiseless step like
a thief over the field of jurisdiction, until
all shall be usurped from the states, and the
government of all be consolidated into one. To
this I am opposed, because when all
government...shall be drawn to Washington as the
center of all power, it will render powerless
the checks provided of one government on
another, and will become as venal and oppressive
as the government from which we separated.
Our
government is now taking so steady a course as
to show by what road it will pass to
destruction, to wit, by consolidation first, and
then corruption, its necessary consequences.
The following year Jefferson's insight sharpened all
the more. His words reveal the accuracy of his
foresight:
If ever
this vast country is brought under a single
government, it will be one of the most
extensive corruption...
In fact
Jefferson had misgivings about the state of affairs
in America many years before he wrote these words.
Between 1784 and 1789 he had been living in France as minister to that
country. Upon his
return to America he was horrified to see how
little effect the grand precepts and provisos of the
Declaration of Independence, which he had chiefly
formulated, had made. Alfred Jay Knock explains:
On
arriving in New York and resuming his place in
the social life of the country, he was greatly
depressed by the discovery that the principles
of the Declaration had gone wholly by the board.
No one spoke of natural rights and popular
sovereignty, it would seem actually that no one
had ever heard of them. On the contrary,
everyone was talking about the pressing need of
a strong central coercive authority, able to
check the incursions which the "democratic
spirit" was likely to incite upon "the men of
principle and property"...Clearly, though the
Declaration might have been the charter of
American independence, it was in no sense the
charter of the new American State -
(Our
Enemy, the State)
Patrick
Henry, long time critic of the Constitution's
drafters, also clearly foresaw the totalitarianism
of the Federalists:
My great
objection to this Government is, that it does
not leave us the means of defending our rights;
or of waging war against tyrants...Have we the
means of resisting disciplined armies, when our
only defense, the militia, is put into the hands
of Congress?
-
(Speech of 5 June 1788)
Did
you ever read of any revolution in any nation,
brought about by the punishment of those in
power, inflicted by those who had no power at
all?...Will your Mace-bearer be a match for a
disciplined regiment?...Will the oppressor ever
let go of the oppressed? Was there ever an
instance? Can the annals of mankind exhibit one
single example, where rulers, overcharged with
power, willingly let go of the oppressed? -
ibid
A
standing army we shall have also, to execute the
execrable commands of tyranny - ibid
Alfred
Jay Nock summarizes the travesty and the tragedy
in these words:
Nowhere in the history of the constitutional
period do we find the faintest suggestion of
the Declaration's doctrine of natural
rights, and we find its doctrine of popular
sovereignty not only continuing in abeyance,
but constitutionally estopped from ever
reappearing. Nowhere do we find a trace of
the Declaration's theory of government, on
the contrary, we find it expressly
repudiated. The new political mechanism was
a faithful replica of the old disestablished
British model, but so far improved and
strengthened as to be incomparably more
close-working and efficient...presenting
more attractive possibilities of capture and
control -
(Our
Enemy, the State)
Note the Masonic colors of Maher's tie.
The attitude seen here is not a matter
of humor. What you see is the way it
is. A picture speaks a thousand
words.
Nothing that
governments do is new. Despots within government
operate according to plans that are
repeated in various ways over generations. Their
control is aided and abetted by their
co-conspirators in the media. The politicians and
media spin doctors are instructed by overlords who
control the private banks and "philanthropic"
foundations.
Public sentiment is everything. With public
sentiment nothing can fail. Without it nothing
can succeed. He who molds opinion is greater
than he who enacts laws - Abraham Lincoln
In many
cases the politicians, media men and bankers are themselves
under the tutelage and direction of British and
European aristocracy who have made the "board," so
to speak, on which the great geopolitical games are
played.
The
conspirators who organize the geopolitical game are cautious and do not want their true allegiances or
diabolical schemes to be publicly exposed.
Each group and individual conspirator knows how
vulnerable they are. They know the facts about
their true allegiances and agendas must never leak
out to the masses at large. Their success
depends upon human apathy and ignorance.
In "Red Dusk and the Morrow"...by Sir Paul
Dukes, formerly Chief of the British Secret
Service in Russia, we read that a Lithuanian
asked a prominent Bolshevik how the regime
was maintained. The answer was: "Our power
is based on three things: first, on Jewish
brains; secondly, on Lettish and Chinese
bayonets; and thirdly, on the crass
stupidity of the Russian people - Denis
Fahey (The Rulers of Russia)
The elitist
conspirators also
know that should civil unrest occur, the masses can
be forced back into line by threats to their
material and emotional security. The strategy is tried and
true, and usually works wonders. As Ernest Hemmingway explained:
The
first panacea for a mismanaged nation is
inflation of the currency; the second is war.
Both bring a temporary prosperity and both bring
a permanent ruin. But both are the refuge of
political and economic opportunists.
The Trinity of Slavery. This basic diagram
delineates how Atonist royals maintain world control.
By way of theology and politics is the
human heart and mind enslaved. Through
secret societies the
hierarchy of control is perpetuated and
monitored. As French poet Charles Peguy
wrote: "Tyranny is always better
organized that freedom."
Because
of the confessions and evidence provided by
intelligent, informed whistleblowers
from within religion, politics,
royalty and masonry, we know a great
deal about how the engines of world
control operate. However, there are also
pitfalls when insiders with myopic
insight, and inflexible allegiances and
prejudices, attempt to instruct the
masses as to the intricacies of world
control. When it comes to exposing the
dirty little secrets, and the dirty big
secrets, of those occupying the highest
levels of the Atonist power-pyramid,
objectivity is essential. Photographs of
their hideous visages, taken from a
rickety platform constructed by their
agents, will be “blurred” and
inadequate, to say the least.
Philosopher Ayn Rand frequently warned readers
about the evils of
big government:
Instead of
being a protector of man’s rights, the
government is becoming their most dangerous
violator; instead of guarding freedom the
government is establishing slavery; instead of
protecting men from the initiators of physical
force, the government is initiating physical
force and coercion in any manner and issue it
pleases; instead of serving as the instrument of
objectivity in human relationships, the
government is creating a deadly subterranean
reign of uncertainty and fear…instead of
protecting men from injury by whim, the
government is arrogating to itself the power of
unlimited whim – so that we are fast approaching
the stage of the ultimate inversion: the stage
where the government is free to do anything it
pleases, while the citizens may act only by
permission; which is the stage of the darkest
periods of human history, the stage of rule by
brute force.
Rand laid it on the line
when addressing the crimes of
government:
Criminals are a
small minority in any age or community. And
the harm they have dome to mankind is
infinitesimal when compared to the
horrors – the bloodshed, the wars, the
persecution, the famines, the
enslavements, the wholesale destruction
– perpetrated by mankind’s governments.
Potentially, a
government is the most dangerous threat
to man’s rights - When unlimited and
unrestricted by individual rights, a
government is men’s deadliest enemy.
Before her
perceptive words were written, French
philosopher
Pierre Joseph Proudhon addressed
the "people versus government" problem:
To be Governed is to be watched, inspected,
spied upon, directed, law-driven, numbered,
regulated, enrolled, indoctrinated, preached at,
controlled, checked, estimated, valued,
censured, commanded, by creatures who have
neither the right nor the wisdom nor the virtue
to do so. To be Governed is to be at every
operation, at every transaction noted,
registered, counted, taxed, stamped, measured,
numbered, assessed, licensed, authorized,
admonished, prevented, forbidden, reformed,
corrected, punished. It is, under pretext of
public utility, and in the name of the general
interest, to be placed under contribution,
drilled, fleeced, exploited, monopolized,
extorted from, squeezed, hoaxed, robbed; then,
at the slightest resistance, the first word of
complaint, to be repressed, fined, vilified,
harassed, hunted down, abused, clubbed,
disarmed, bound, choked, imprisoned, judged,
condemned, shot, deported, sacrificed, sold,
betrayed; and to crown all, mocked, ridiculed,
derided, outraged, dishonored. That is
government; that is its justice; that is its
morality - (General
Idea of the Revolution in the Nineteenth Century)
Victorian philosopher
Herbert Spencer pondered whether man requires
governments at all:
What, then, do they (Humans) want a
government for? Not to regulate commerce; not to
educate the people; not to teach religion; not
to administer charity; not to make roads and
railways; but simply to defend the natural
rights of man - to protect person and property -
to prevent the aggressions of the powerful upon
the weak - in a word, to administer justice.
This is the natural, the original, office of a
government. It was not intended to do less: it
ought not to be allowed to do more -
(The Man Versus the State)
He also
wrote:
The great political superstition
of the past was the divine right of kings. The
great political superstition of the present is
the divine right of parliaments.
Father of the Anarchist movement, Mikhail Bakunin
-
who spent many years imprisoned in dungeons - knew
all about government oppression. For him
governments were unnecessary institutions that
darkened the world:
The liberty of man consists solely in this, that
he obeys the laws of nature, because he has
himself recognized them as such, and not because
they have been imposed upon him externally by
any foreign will whatsoever, human or divine,
collective or individual – (God and the
State, 1882)
German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche understood
why governments exist, and how they maintain
their malignant dominion:
...a fullness of state power such as only
despotism had enjoyed...surpassed all
the past because it strove for the formal
annihilation of the individual...Once the earth
is brought under all-embracing economic control,
then mankind will find it has been reduced to
machinery in its service, as a monstrous
clockwork system of ever smaller, more finely
adjusted wheels.
Spanish
philosopher Jose Ortega Y Gasset explained State
corruption in these words:
This is
the gravest danger that today threatens
civilization: State intervention, the absorption
of all spontaneous social effort by the State,
that is to say, of spontaneous historical
action, which in the long-run sustains,
nourishes and impels human destinies.
His
sentiments were shared by the American critic Henry
L. Menken, who said the Federal State:
...has
spread out its powers until they penetrate to
every act of the citizen, however secret, it has
begun to throw around its operations the high
dignity and impeccability of a State religion,
its agents become a separate and superior caste,
with authority to bind and loose...But it still
remains, as it was in the beginning, the common
enemy of all well-disposed industrious and
decent men.
In his
important book on State totalitarianism,
Our Enemy, the State, Albert Jay Nock
explained the motives of State officials:
It is
unfortunately none too well understood that,
just as the State has no money of its own, so it
has no power of its own. All power it has is
what society gives it, plus what it confiscates
from time to time on one pretext or another;
there is no other source from which State power
can be drawn. Therefore every assumption of
State power, whether by gift or seizure, leaves
society with so much less power; there is never,
nor can be, any strengthening of State power
without a corresponding and roughly equivalent
depletion of social power.
Nock
understands that there is not a jot of difference
between American Federalists and the diabolical
fascists who have plagued the world. He put the
matter plainly:
The
superficial distinctions of Fascism, Bolshevism,
Hitlerism, are the concern of journalists and
publicists, the serious student sees in them
only one root-idea of a complete conversion of
social power to State power...The positive
testimony of history is that the State
invariably had its origin in conquest and
confiscation. No known State known to history
originated in any other manner.
The men who
profited from the Constitution's acceptance,
expertly used fear to further their interests and to
goad delegates into compliance with their will. They
manipulated the fact that Americans were traumatized
and exhausted by war. They stage-managed the
Conventions and controlled media reportage of events
in Virginia and Philadelphia.
Freedom can go to hell, but apparently silly belief
systems and prejudices are always
welcome to stay.
If the people
had the time to relax and educate themselves, if they
had paid attention to the warnings of Thomas Paine,
Patrick Henry, and the other critics who
suspected what the conspirators were planning, the
Constitution would never have been ratified.
The best the
people
belatedly received was the
Bill of Rights drafted in 1791. It was expressly
created to protect
people against potential abuses of the ill-received
Constitution. It was conceded to the American people
by Madison, who by then had secured all that he and
his Federalist colleagues demanded.
A
number of states had accepted the Constitution
with urgent recommendations for changes. At
first, it seemed that Congress would pay no
attention to these suggestions. Patrick Henry
and other then set up a clamor which had to be
heeded, and Congress referred the proposals to a
committee - Nevins and Commanger (Pocket
History of the U.S.)
The
federalists delayed ratification of the Bill of
Rights for over two years while they organized
the new federal courts and armed the judges with
powers to counter individual rights -
Kenneth W. Royce (Hologram of Liberty)
The
Federalists instigated virtual panic, and made sure
the people were not able to take time to
repair and think. Their representatives and
delegates were harried into accepting and signing
the Constitution. The same methods of "conflict control"
have been used throughout the generations. They are still
being put to good use by politicians and parties. In the 1960s, Ex-Communist Jerry Kirk
discovered how the great game is played. He
eloquently explained the process in these words:
The
idea is to create a situation where the people
are so frightened of the chaos all around them,
that they will throw their arms up in the air
and shout “Federal Government, do something!”
And the only choice open will be Martial Law…The
Communists, black militants and revolutionaries
will never succeed in overthrowing the
government of the United States, but unless they
are stopped, they will scare the American people
into accepting Socialism from Washington, and
status rule from the Establishment. This is what
it is really all about.
Expert on
the British takeover of America, G. Edward
Griffin, delineates the phenomena of conflict control,
in these words:
…deliberately create problems,
and then offer only those solutions which result
in the expansion of government. Create
conditions so frightful at home and abroad that
the abandonment of personal liberties and
national sovereignty will appear as a reasonable
price for a return to domestic tranquillity and
world peace - (The Capitalist Conspiracy)
Student
Socialist agitator James S.
Kunen also discovered how
the upper echelon conspires to foment social unrest,
so the true enemies of freedom remain
undetected:
In the evening we went up to the
University to check out a strategy meeting. A
kid was giving a report on the SDS Convention.
He said that...at the Convention men from
Business International Roundtables...tried to
buy up a few radicals...These men are the
world's leading industrialists and they convene
to decide how our lives are going to go. These
are the guys who wrote the Alliance for
Progress. They are the left wing of the ruling
class...They offered to finance our
demonstrations in Chicago (l968). We were offered Esso (Rockefeller) money. They want us to make a
lot of radical commotion so they can look more
in the center as they move to the left
- (The Strawberry
Statement: Notes of a College Revolutionary)
The
scrapping of the US Constitution is essential.
Americans must revise and update the Articles of
Confederation and abolish the
corrupt totalitarian Federal apparatus of control. Americans must wake
up from their delirium and find out what kind of
conspiracy has been occurring in their land. They
must contemplate the words of Bertrand de Jouvenal,
who said
"A society of sheep must in time beget a
government of wolves," and remember that it was
mutineers and not conformists who founded America.
People
should not be afraid of their
governments; governments should be
afraid of the people!
The traitors are still with us.
Indeed their treachery is greater than ever. Hiding
behind the Constitution and political process they
see to it America's ports are sold and that
schools are swamped and under-funded. Because of
their scandalous policies America's heavy industry
operates at a minimum. American businesses are
throttled by legality and taxation, while foreign-made products fill the shelves. Companies and jobs
are perpetually outsourced, prisons supersize and innocent men and women languish behind bars to be
raped and tortured. Poisons fall from the sky
in the form of chemtrails, and illegal aliens occupy
like invading armies, enjoying the
"fruits" they did nothing to cultivate or harvest.
It all occurs in a country that came out of World War II
richer than it went in.
Why is this the case? What has happened? Why have so few
taken so much from so many for so long?
As of 2000, USA Today
reports on its front page that 6.6 million
adults (three percent of the adult population)
are in prison or “correction.” No other society
as ever done so deadly a thing to its people and
on such a scale - Gore Vidal (Imperial
America)
We have two million people in
jail. Our country doesn't build hospitals,
doesn't build schools and doesn't build day-care
centers. It builds prisons. This is not the
hallmark of a free society, but of a police
state - Steven Hager (High Times
Editor-in-Chief)
Oriental countries prosper and
rise economically. The Third World is fast becoming
the First World, while the First World nose dives
into ruin. This was the plan from the outset. It is
the result of tyranny not democracy. It is also the
result of apathy. No truer words on the subject were
stated than those by President Abraham Lincoln:
These
United States of America can never be destroyed
from forces outside its borders. If America
falls, it will fall from within. Brought down by
apathy. When good people do nothing, Anarchy
reigns – (Letter to Congress, 1854)
Lincoln also
emphasized the despotism of wealthy oligarchs
who prosper from the ignorance and apathy of the
masses. Their profile and resume was well known to
him:
The
money power preys upon the nation in times of
peace and conspires against it in times of
adversity. It is more despotic than a monarchy,
more insolent than autocracy, more selfish than
bureaucracy.
Robert Maynard Hutchins also
commented on the apathetic state brought on by
over-stimulation and trauma:
The death of democracy is
not likely to be an assassination from ambush. It will be a slow extinction from apathy,
indifference, and undernourishment.
Senator from
Nevada, George W. Malone, made the following statement before Congress
in 1957:
I believe that if the people of
this nation fully understood what Congress has
done to them over the last 49 years, they would
move on Washington; they would not wait for an
election...It adds up to a preconceived plan to
destroy the economic and social independence of
the United States!
Ironically, during and after the War
of Independence the eyes of the world were on
America. The Czar of Russia, Nicholas Romanov II,
admired what he saw taking place and, before his
brutal assassination, was ready to emulate the
scintillating American experiment. During the War of
Independence he sent ships, money and troops
to assist American rebels. Russia and many
other countries would
have changed for the better had Americans not been
cajoled into adopting the Constitution.
The good
news is that even the most oppressive tyranny cannot last
forever. Once the tyrant and his heinous industry is
exposed, the game is up. At that point they can be
overthrown, and things can be put aright. It has
happened in Ireland and the Congo, in Cuba and
Nicaragua, and many other lands. But the enemy knows
this only too well. He understands that he is
vulnerable, and is aware of how he could
be undermined. As a result, he is
constantly on
guard. He knows that his activities and methods must
not be properly scrutinized. Consequently, he makes a point of
keeping his subjects in fear for their lives. He
prefers them to be limbic creatures unable to reason
and discern good from bad and right from wrong. He
makes sure their attention is focused elsewhere, and
that strange, demented, and frightening "enemies"
are always rattling the gates. Through his obedient agents, he
funds and controls the supposed enemies, and
instructs them how to operate.
George William Frederick (George III), King of Great
Britain and Hanover. He was a member of the Hanover dynasty -
the so-called House of Orange.
Like numerous royals, he was a demented maniac who
suffered from mental disease. According to author George Trevelyan, he vowed "never to
acknowledge the independence of the Americans, and
to punish their contumacy by the indefinite
prolongation of a war which promised to be eternal."
He wanted to "keep the rebels harassed, anxious, and
poor, until the day when, by a natural and
inevitable process, discontent and disappointment
were converted into penitence and remorse."
In this manner is the great game of geopolitics and
mass control played. It is simply chess on a global
level. Should a pawn fall off the board or be
sacrificed, the kings, queens and bishops do not
turn a hair. The comfortably placed misleaders bang
the drums of war and send dedicated men and women to
fight and die for the "United States" corporation.
The U.S. is a business, and those who have
given their lives for it died uselessly. Tragically
they have been sacrificed at the behest of their
country's true enemies. As Count Leo Tolstoy wisely
said "Government is an association of men who do
violence to the rest of us."
Military men are dumb, stupid
animals, to be used as pawns for
foreign policy – Henry Kissinger
(January-February 2003 edition of Eagle Newsletter)
It's not a number I’m terribly
interested in – Colin Powell (reply
when asked about the Iraqi casualties)
The
men who committed this atrocity in New York, on
September Eleventh 2001, mass murdered more
people than the combined killings of every
serial killer in the 228 year history of the United States - Anthony J. Hilder (The
Greatest Lie Ever Sold)
Our point is
simple. We insist that the predators and parasites
who have vampirized America and the world must be
closely studied. Understanding how and why they
function as they do provides us with the keys
of worldly salvation.
Moreover, we must understand
that elite despots of the world are creatures of
habit. The enjoy repetition and their nefarious strategies
are tried and true. Additionally, we need to
understand that despots bank on one human weakness,
forgetfulness.
President Andrew Jackson suffered
terribly at under
the British Crown. During the war he and his brother were captured, held
prisoner and nearly starved to death.
When Andrew refused to clean the boots
of a red coat, he was slashed at with a
sword which left him with scars on his left
hand and head. His brother Robert died
from smallpox contracted while captive. Jackson's immediate
family died from war-related hardships.
As a result of his horrific experiences,
Jackson never forgave the British
oppressors.
Historical amnesia hands them
the power they covet. As Milan Kundera so
appropriately said: "The
struggle of man against power is the struggle of
memory against forgetting."
The answer
to humankind's future lies in remembering what has
transpired in history. It lies in not repeating past
mistakes, and not falling for the same tired
political fallacies. Furthermore, we
must end our psychological dependence on the fiends
who have established despotic forms of government
and who benefit from our allegiance. As long as
we consciously or unconsciously identify with the predator, we will never see the
demise of tyranny, regardless of the political
action taken. It will raise its ugly head time
and time again. Ultimately, we must judge our misleaders by
their deeds and not by their words.
We must be
on guard against their rhetoric and sophistry, and
not hesitate to use existing laws to prevent them
doing their worst. We must not be afraid to seek
justice when degenerate, self-serving politicians -
supposedly acting in our name - seek to lead us
astray.
Civil disobedience is not our
problem. Our problem is civil obedience. Our
problem is that numbers of people all over the
world have obeyed the dictates of the leaders of
their government and have gone to war, and
millions have been killed because of this
obedience...Our problem is that people are
obedient all over the world in the face of
poverty and starvation and stupidity, and war,
and cruelty. Our problem is that people are
obedient while the jails are full of petty
thieves, and all the while the grand thieves are
running the country. That's our problem
- Howard Zinn
The Articles
of Confederation worked to bring security to all
Americans. They restored order after the chaos of
the War of Independence. Unlike the US Constitution,
the Articles of Confederation honored the rights of
individual States.
Americans don't care about politics,
only about politicians - Anthony
Wedgwood Benn
The Articles
did not distinguish between rich and poor. They were
meant for Citizens, not "People,"
and did
not permit an oligarchy to assume totalitarian
control. The men who drafted and ratified the US
Constitution were hungry for power over human
beings. They adamantly wanted to protect their own
prestige and wealth. Despite their megalomania they
knew what they wanted and how to go about
getting it. They acted like proverbial wolves in
sheep's clothing.
Their
Constitution is deceptive in form
and substance. It allowed an aristocracy to
preside in America. The American-based aristocrats
may not wear crowns or sit on thrones but are
in many cases directly connected to royal
dynasties of Britain and Europe.
George W.
Bush is, for example, a distant cousin of John
Kerry, Presidential nominee who ran against him
in 2004. Kerry's parents are not Irish but
Jewish. On the matter of his aristocratic ancestry
we read:
Senator John Kerry has blue
blood from all the royal houses of Europe, with
even more titled relations than President
Bush…Burke’s Peerage, which researches the
genealogy, said the Democratic presidential
candidate traces descent through his mother,
Rosemary Forbes, to the royal houses of Albania,
England, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Russia,
Byzantium, Persia (Iran) and France. Forbes was
descended from William Forbes, the Laird of Newe,
and extended family that included many
baronets…It is via this family that the
Democratic candidate is descended from Henry II,
the king of England and father of Richard the
Lionheart, who was the leader of the third
Crusade in 1189…By contrast, Bush is related to
Queen Elizabeth II, twenty British dukes and many
European princes…President Bush, Princess Diana
and Winston Churchill are distantly related
- (Union Jack
Newspaper;
September 2000 Edition)
George H. W.
Bush and wife Barbara are related to the same
British oligarchs. George is also:
...closely related to every European monarch on
and off the throne – and has kinship with every
member of Britain’s royal family, the House of
Windsor. He is the 13th cousin of Britain’s
Queen Mother, and of her daughter Queen
Elizabeth, and is the 13th cousin once removed
of the heir to the throne, Prince Charles.
Bush’s family tree can be documented as far back
as the early 15th century. He has a direct
descent from Henry III and from Henry VIII’s
sister Mary Tudor who was also the wife of Louis
XI of France. He is also descended from Charles
II of England - David Icke (Alice in
Wonderland and the World Trade Center Disaster)
Father
George and wife Barbara are both descendants of
Godfroi de Bouillon who, in 1099, led European
noblemen in the successful Crusade to recapture
Jerusalem from the Islamic faith and moved into
the King’s palace at Temple Mount…Godfroi de
Bouillon was the first king of Jerusalem and
the Duke of Lower Lorraine, a major region for
the Illuminati bloodline - ibid
The time has
come for the veils of mystique to be torn away from
the so-called "Fathers" of the Constitution. They were not
champions of a free, sovereign nation, and their legacy is
neither auspicious nor grand. They chose to subvert
the Articles that guaranteed freedom to every
American. They coveted
power and made themselves fabulously
rich by exploiting the gullibility and ignorance
of the moral but illiterate, masses. In our time their
villainous counterparts in government have shifted
into overdrive. Their heinous acts of conquest, extortion and confiscation
know no bounds. As long as ignorance of the enemy's
nature persists, nothing will change, and the
pirates of Capitol Hill will
continue to ply their insidious trade. As King
George once demanded, the war against America was to be
waged eternally. His desire is being fulfilled as
every day passes. Unless the
Machiavellian intrigues of his biological and
ideological descendants are exposed and overcome,
America's ruin is certain.
The task is, however, impossible without
knowledge of the adversary. Knowledge is the
weapon we must use to eradicate the imperious
predators that lurk behind the long grass. of
history.
“Conspiracy!” One of the darkest words in the
language of man. Yet there is hardly a single
page of History that does not partially reveal
the deadly eye of Conspiracy at work.
It was a conspiracy that lead
Brutus against Caesar in the Roman senate on the
Ides of March...that plotted the betrayal of
West Point by Benedict Arnold, during the
American Revolution…that led John Wilkes Booth
to the assassination of President Lincoln on
Good Friday 1865. The past record of man
is burdened with accounts of assassinations,
secret combines, palace plots and betrayals in
war. But in spite of
this clear record, an amazing number of people
have begun to scoff at the possibility of
conspiracy at work today. They dismiss such an
idea merely as a conspiratorial view - G.
Edward Griffin (The Capitalist Conspiracy)
Knowledge of
the enemy is the golden key that opens the gate to a
future free of tyranny and slavery. We not only owe
our children a freer
future - we owe it to our forebears. Those who
fought and labored to create the elements of
civilization we enjoy, but who were
treacherously undermined and robbed, must be
remembered and reverently toasted. It is their
memory we honor, not that of their destroyers.
Where other men have skimmed the
surface, Beard has gone through to the core.
He stayed months in Washington to get to the
core. In his search for ancient papers and
documents in the Treasury Department, he went
into vaults that were so filled with dust that
it was necessary to excavate the papers with a
vacuum cleaner. But when he came back to the
surface he had damning evidence against a good
many of the "patriot fathers." He then knew why
they were so anxious, not only for a new
constitution, but for the particular kind of a
constitution that was afterward adopted -
Allan L. Benson (The Dishonest Constitution)
◊ ◊ ◊
Here
- for Part One: "Weapons of Mass Destruction Found"
Dope Inc
- L. Larouche, W. Tarpley (& Co)
Treason in America- Anton Chaitkin
The Empire of the City - E. C. Knuth In the Beginning: Story of the
International Trade Cartel
- R. K. Hoskins Secret Societies of America's Elite
-
Steven Stora The Secret Terrorists - Bill
Hughes The Enemy Unmasked - Bill
Hughes Tragedy and Hope - Dr. Carroll Quigley The Anglo-American Establishment - Dr.
Carroll Quigley Fifty Years in the Church of Rome
- Father Chiniquy The Secret History
of the Jesuits - Edmund Paris Vatican
Billions - Avro Manhattan The Vatican
Moscow Washington Alliance
- Avro
Manhattan The Vatican Holocaust - Avro
Manhattan Vatican Assassins - Eric Jon
Phelps The Black Pope - Cusack
The Other Side of Rome - J. B. Wilder
Romanism as a World Power -Luther
Kaufmann The Jesuits: A Complete History -
Griesinger History of Romanism -
Rev. John Dowling The Crisis: Enemies of
America Unmasked - J. Wayne Laurens
The Jesuit Conspiracy - The Abbate Leone
The Thrilling Mysteries of a Convent Revealed
- Anon The Awful Disclosures of Maria
Monk - Anon Footprints of the Jesuits
- R. W. Thompson Engineer Corps of
Hell - Edwin Sherman (translator)
Popery, Puseyism, Jesuitism - Luigi
Desanctis History of the Jesuits - G.
B. Nicolini Secret Instructions of the
Jesuits - W. C. Brownlee Secret Powers
Behind World Revolution - Vicomte Leon de
Poncins Judaism and the Vatican -
Vicomte Leon de Poncins State Secrets -
Vicomte Leon de Poncins Freemasonry
and the Vatican - Vicomte Leon de Poncins Previews of the New Papacy - Atila Sinke
Guimaraes Bad Popes - E. R. Chamberlin Secret Societies & Subversive Movements -
Nesta Webster The French Revolution -
Nesta Webster World Revolution - Nesta
Webster Illuminsim - Nesta Webster Occult Theocracy - Edith Star Mille (Lady
Queensborough) Architects of Deception
- Juri Lina Under the Sign of the Scorpion
- Juri Lina America's Secret Establishment
- Anthony Sutton Trilaterals Over America
- Anthony Sutton The Creature from
Jekyll Island - G. Edward Griffin The
Capitalist Conspiracy - G. Edward Griffin The World Order - Eustace Mullins
Secrets of the Federal Reserve-
Eustace Mullins Controversy of Zion -
Douglas Reed Bloodlines of the Illuminati
- Fritz Springmeier Called to Serve -
Lt. Col. James "Bo" Gritz Hitler Was a
British Agent - Gregg Hallet Crimes
and Mercies - James Bacque
Conspirator's Hierarchy: The Committee of 300
- J. Coleman The Tavistock Institute of
Human Relations - John Coleman
Diplomacy By Deception - John Coleman
None Dare Call It Conspiracy - Sen. Gary
Allen The Rockefeller File - Sen. Gary
Allen Kissinger:The Secret Side of
the Secretary of State - Sen. Gary Allen The Unseen Hand - Ralph Epperson
The True History of the Bilderberg Group -
Daniel Estulin
My Awakening - David Duke Imperial Hubris - Michael Scheuer
Al Qaeda - Jason Burke Imperial
America - Gore Vidal Perpetual War for
Perpetual Peace - Gore Vidal Full
Spectrum Dominance - Rahul Mahajan The
War on Truth - Nafeez Ahmed The War on
Freedom - Nafeez Ahmed The London
Bombings - Nafeez Ahmed Behind the War
on Terror - Nafeez Ahmed Drugs, Oil
and War - Prof. Dale Scott Frontier
Justice - Scott Ritter War on Iraq
- Scott Ritter Manufacturing Consent -
Noam Chomsky
The Power of Israel in the United States - James Petras
Web of Deceit: The Shocking Truth About our
Money - E. H. Brown
Dark Ages of America -
Morris Berman The Manipulated Man -
Esther Vilar Thy Will be Done: Nelson
Rockefeller & Evangelism - G. Colby
The Marketing of Evil - David Kupelian The Lords of Poverty - Graham Hancock Sex, Lies and Politics - Larry Flint The Puzzle of Fascism - Eric D. Williams War is a Racket - Gen. Smedley D. Butler Death by Government - R. J. Rummell The Black Book of Communism - Stephane
Courtois
Hologram of Liberty -
Kenneth. W. Royce Our Enemy, the State - Albert Jay
Nock An Economic
Interpretation of the Constitution - Charles
A. Beard The Constitution That Never
Was - Ralph
Boryszewski The Federalist Papers - Douglas Adair
Democracy for the Few - Michael Parenti The Ominous Parallels - Leonard
Peikoff
Here - To watch
Michael Tsarion's "The Declaration Deception"